Shop More Submit  Join Login
×

Featured in Collections

Literature by Prithvi-Enoch


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
December 6, 2012
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
205,785 (237 today)
Favourites
18 (who?)
Comments
78
×
I've been here on DA for around 5 1/2 years now, and for the first 4 years I really didn't even use it.  I posted some sketches and seemed like nobody was paying attention...

But that's quite all right.  I'm not at all externally focused and I know that what others think (especially on the internet, on social networking sites) have absolutely no effect on what I choose to do or how I choose to do it.  So you may ask, "why are you even on here?", and that is a good question.  The reason I post what I do is a clear signal to the "universe" (for the lack of a better term) that this is what I have chosen to do.  It's almost irrelevant what my viewers think of what I am doing because I'm not doing it for them.  But that makes me sound unfriendly..  If you like it, good.  If you don't like it, good.  If you get rude or obnoxious or hypocritical, well that's annoying a little bit:)

So during this last 12 to 15 months I've been posting nude photos and my views have gone from 7000 to 110000.  The categories don't let me choose just "nude", it makes me choose "artistic nude", but whether it's artistic or not in somebody's idea of categories does not matter even a little bit.  But to some of my visitors that seems to be an issue.  I also get a lot of "this is porn".  And that is really what I'd like to talk about.

I think there is probably a clear indication when something is definitely porn; penetration, oral, erections, insertions, dildos, etc.  Also  maybe the fact that they are on commercial pay sites promoting their content as porn, or even the free sites which exist to give samples that drive paying customers.  DA is clearly not one of those places, so if the photos comply with DA policies against porn, it's a little more difficult (it seems for some) to distinguish what is what.  I've seen others discuss this topic and some will point to examples and make references, but let me make this simple for you.

You live in a world of subjective reality.  If you think it's porn, you are right.  If you think it's art, you are right.

For example, when most of us look at cute little 5-year old children, we see kids; noisy dirty energetic lovable kids.  When a pedophile looks at the same kids, he may see sexual objects.  In his reality, he is right, regardless of what the rest of us think.  And you won't convince him otherwise.

So, for you sexually frustrated porn searchers coming here filling up your spank-bank, please stop coming to my page with your penis in your hand and we can keep my page porn-free!!

Thank you:)
Add a Comment:
 
:iconeldiabolito:
ElDiabolito Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014  Professional Filmographer
Good points for sure.  What I don't understand, and find most puzzling of all, is the refusal to accept eroticism in art?  Why can't sex be artistic?  It is in and of itself a CREATIVE process...in fact, one of the most fundamental creative processes inimical to all of life.  The adaptations and evolution of various biological systems over countless millenia are astounding, and are made even more incredible when you consider all of the infinite and diverse methods of social and cultural evolution that form around sex and reproduction.  How is this not art, and why can't it be art?  Because of penises and 'ginies and boobies?  The rationale seems somewhat reductionist and childish.  Art is all of creation, all of experience, and yes, that means both the wondrous AND the profane.  It's what challenges the viewer, and in challenging, evokes emotion - arousal, rage, sadness, awe, joy, bitterness, all the myriad of feelings that we are capable of.  So I say, porn IS art.  It can be a celebration of the animal, the carnal, the flesh and the blood and the fluids that we as high-thinking humans tend to shy from; but sex is our bodies and functions laid bare to an outside party.  It is the sweat and tears and rawness of vulnerability that is frightening...and to many revolting...that is the essence of biological, emotional, HUMAN existence.  Or at least that's my slant on it.  :P
Reply
:iconflatographer:
Flatographer Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2014  Professional Photographer
Exactly.  Hit it right on the head.  

Nobody has been appointed the High Arbiter of Art.  Art isn't defined by its audience, it's defined by the process that brought it to existence.  Someone thought of something.  They created a representation of that thought.  Bingo.  Art.

Great treatise on the topic!
Reply
:icondarknessofanubis:
darknessofanubis Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Some thing happened to me! I couldn't get arrested for the first five years I had my page and then when I started posting erotic art like mummy, blueberry, jungle, ect my page views went through the roof! Go figure......
Reply
:icon100100110:
100100110 Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2014
Bravo! Well said 'sensei.
Reply
:iconknight501:
Knight501 Featured By Owner May 17, 2014
It is silly that people think every photo that involves nudes is porn, and if that is their definition then why the heck do they click on it anyways? wouldn't they not want to see it up close (not click). Just clicking of it to say that just waste the artist's time.
Reply
:iconxristjan:
xRiStJaN Featured By Owner May 2, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
best and most authentic Journal entry I ve ever read here!
Reply
:icongaucho-dc:
gaucho-dc Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2014
Thank you !, thank you for making it clear that someone nude form is not porn, that art is not porn to fools so easily offended, intolerant and nude phobic that want  Michelangelo's David wearing shorts !!!
Reply
:iconartist4569:
ARTIST4569 Featured By Owner Mar 18, 2014  Professional Traditional Artist
just because of this journal post i chose to watch your work.  im an artist ( duuu) lol. i have a focus on the female form. the curves, shadows the eyes......sorry got side tracked.  rock on and keep up the awesome work. hell with what otyhers think your right its for your enjoyment. thsats what art is all about.


rock on
Reply
:iconmalcite:
malcite Featured By Owner Mar 13, 2014  Student Digital Artist
I started out that way, using it as a cheap free "porn" site back in the days, but luckily I have grown up since then. Actually I grew into the images in the way that they made me see lights, shades, contrast, color. basically anything that is related to making a photo good.

As for what qualifies as porn, you are right on some points (i think erections are allowed on dA as long as its not being used :P )

But at the same time, we are all human beings here and subject to the same primal urges we all (normally) should feel. The difference is if we choose to control it or not.

All the spunk monkeys that drop by here, for me its fine if they hang around, but like you, I hate seeing "this is porn", and to all the other sly comments that appear (I don't have any images that would provoke such a comment) well, if they visit the site and use it. I think that can be ok, the problem is the comments. So if they could just stop doing that then it would be fine also. Don't you think so?
Reply
:iconscriptsensei:
scriptsensei Featured By Owner Mar 14, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
Yes, I agree.  I don't care what kind of reactions people get from the images if they want to discuss it in an open and intelligent way, but when some tool comes by and declares that something is porn it's like they don't even see that there may be hundreds of others who don't necessarily agree, and only their opinion matters.  I don't believe that they're mature enough or sophisticated enough to understand that they are declaring something about themselves and not the image they are looking at.
Reply
Add a Comment: